Investors should scrutinise new fund launches beyond NAV movements, experts advise

As new mutual fund offers hit the market without a performance track record, investors are urged to focus on portfolio construction, manager commitments, and diversification potential to make informed decisions.

A new fund offer has no performance history at the moment it launches, so investors need to judge it differently from an established scheme. According to Kuvera, the real question in the first months is not whether the net asset value rises every day, but whether the fund is building a portfolio that matches the strategy promised at launch and whether the manager is sticking to that mandate.

The first checks are straightforward. Monthly fact sheets, portfolio disclosures and fund manager updates can show how the holdings are being assembled, how concentrated the fund is and why certain investments were chosen. Tata AIA’s guidance says NAV movement can give a basic reading of market response, but the more useful evidence comes from the portfolio itself and the manager’s own explanation of early decisions.

That matters because many new offers are launched in thematic or sectoral areas, where concentration risk can be high. Finset’s analysis found that about 48% of active equity NFOs launched between 2020 and March 2026 underperformed their benchmarks, with sectoral and thematic funds doing even worse, at a 50% failure rate. The broader lesson, the site argues, is that investors are often backing untested execution rather than a proven record. Research from the University of Chicago and S&P Dow Jones Indices also shows that active funds often struggle to beat their benchmarks after accounting for market conditions and risk.

Investors should also ask whether a new launch adds anything they do not already own. Kuvera recommends comparing the NFO’s benchmark with the benchmarks of existing funds; if there is more than 50% overlap in constituents, the new scheme may offer little diversification. Cost is another early concern, especially when higher launch-era expense ratios and exit loads could make the fund harder to hold for the long term. For that reason, many advisers prefer waiting until a fund has built at least a three-year record before making a serious commitment.

Disclaimer: This article is intended to inform and educate, not to recommend or endorse any financial product, investment or strategy. Please consider your own financial circumstances and seek professional advice where appropriate before making financial decisions.