BRICS nations are considering a framework to connect national instant-payment systems and central bank digital currencies, aiming to make cross-border transactions faster, cheaper, and more efficient without a shared currency, as part of broader economic resilience efforts.
BRICS is weighing a quieter but potentially more consequential experiment than a common currency: linking national instant-payment systems and central bank digital currencies to make cross-border transactions faster and cheaper. Reuters reported that the idea is still at an early stage, with no agreed technical model, governance structure or timetable, but it has moved high enough up the agenda to be discussed at India’s 2026 BRICS summit. Reserve Bank of India Governor Sanjay Malhotra said multiple options were under review and argued that cross-border payments offered clear scope to cut costs.
The distinction matters. A shared payment network would not replace the rupee, real, yuan, rand or the other currencies used by BRICS members. Instead, it would aim to make those national systems interoperable, allowing banks, companies and consumers to settle transactions across borders without needing a single bloc-wide currency. That is a far more modest ambition than earlier talk of a BRICS currency union, but also a more practical one, because it avoids the need for a common monetary authority or a unified exchange-rate policy.
India has made payment integration a central plank of its BRICS agenda. According to the report by The African Mirror, the idea builds on a 2025 declaration calling for greater interoperability among members’ payment systems, as well as a May 2026 foreign ministers’ meeting that urged work on faster, cheaper and more transparent international transfers. Related summaries say the Reserve Bank of India has also pushed for CBDC integration to be placed on the summit agenda, with some BRICS commentary describing the concept as “BRICS Pay”. Other reporting suggests the bloc sees the project as a way to reduce reliance on dollar-based channels without openly pitching it as an anti-dollar campaign.
The appeal is strongest in day-to-day payments. Domestic instant-payment systems such as India’s Unified Payments Interface and Brazil’s Pix have already changed retail finance at home, while China and Russia have developed their own digital payment and settlement tools. The challenge is that these systems are mainly built for national use. A linked network could, in theory, ease remittances, tourism spending, trade invoices and small-business payments by cutting correspondent-banking layers, shortening settlement times and lowering some transaction fees. That could be especially useful for South Africa, Egypt and Ethiopia, where remittance costs and access to affordable cross-border finance remain persistent problems.
But the technical and political hurdles are substantial. A workable system would need common standards, clear supervision, rules on liquidity and foreign exchange, and legal certainty over how failed transactions are handled. BRICS members would also have to agree how to deal with privacy, data sharing, fraud prevention, anti-money-laundering checks and sanctions compliance. Those questions become harder because the bloc is not uniform: China tightly controls data and capital flows, India has championed open digital infrastructure, Russia is looking for alternatives after sanctions, and Brazil, South Africa and newer members such as the United Arab Emirates each bring different regulatory and monetary priorities.
That diversity also limits how far the project can go in the short term. Related summaries say all core BRICS economies are already running CBDC pilots, but pilots are not the same as an interoperable network. India’s own trade with Russia has shown one of the biggest practical obstacles: when settlements leave one country with large balances in another’s currency, the money can be difficult to recycle at scale. A payment link may make transfers smoother, but it will not by itself solve imbalances in trade or create broad demand for every currency in the bloc.
For now, the plan looks more like an infrastructure test than a challenge to the existing global order. Supporters see it as a way to build resilience against sanctions, payment disruptions and high cross-border costs. Critics will note that the dollar’s global role rests on much more than payment rails, including the depth of US financial markets and the trust they command. What happens next will depend on whether BRICS can move from political signalling to a technical framework, pilot corridors and common compliance rules that banks and businesses are willing to use.
Disclaimer: This article is intended to inform and educate, not to recommend or endorse any financial product, investment or strategy. Please consider your own financial circumstances and seek professional advice where appropriate before making financial decisions.
