Tech professionals are increasingly judging employers through LinkedIn, reviews, employee networks and AI tools, while unclear career paths and weak hands-on training threaten hiring and retention.
Candidates for technology jobs in India are doing far more homework before they apply, and much of that research now happens outside the employer’s control. A study called “What Talent Wants 2026”, based on responses from 2,000 tech, product and data professionals, found that 92 per cent check employers on LinkedIn before submitting an application, while 81 per cent look at company websites and careers pages. Nearly half consult review sites such as Glassdoor or AmbitionBox, 41 per cent ask people they know, and 31 per cent now turn to AI tools for guidance. According to the report highlighted by HRKatha, the result is a hiring environment in which a company’s reputation is assembled long before a recruiter makes first contact.
That shift has changed what counts as employer branding. The survey suggests candidates place the greatest trust in former employees, followed closely by current employees who post on LinkedIn. Company websites still matter, but they are no longer the dominant starting point. Leadership posts carry less weight than many organisations may expect, which means the lived employee experience, rather than the company’s own marketing, is increasingly what shapes perception. In practical terms, a careers page is now only one piece of a broader and less controllable narrative.
The clearest message in the survey is that career progression has become a deal-breaker. A large majority said they want detailed information about growth before they apply or accept an offer, and many would walk away if they could not see a clear route forward. Yet only 46 per cent describe their current career path as very clear. HRKatha said the figure is even lower in global capability centres than in IT services or startups, underlining a gap between what employers may have built internally and what workers actually understand.
The same scrutiny extends to managers and senior leaders. More than half of respondents said a prospective manager’s profile matters before they accept a role, and half would think twice if they could not find enough information about the organisation’s leadership online. That suggests candidates are not only judging companies, but also the people they may report to. Visibility, credibility and a sense of accessibility now play a direct role in hiring decisions, even before interviews begin.
Artificial intelligence is another area where expectation and delivery appear badly out of step. According to the Talent500 report cited by The People’s Board, 71 per cent of professionals value hands-on AI upskilling, but only 29 per cent say their employer provides it. The gap matters because workers are not simply asking for theory or certification. They want practical exposure that helps them build real skills through day-to-day work. In a market where AI capability is quickly becoming a basic requirement, employers that offer training without meaningful application may struggle to keep ambitious staff.
The report also highlights a wider tension around pay and retention. Many employers use equity as a long-term incentive, yet fewer than half of respondents said they understand restricted stock units, vesting and dilution well enough to judge an offer properly. That weakens the motivational power of awards that may be financially valuable but poorly understood. It also suggests compensation design and compensation comprehension are not the same thing: a package can look strong on paper while still failing to persuade employees to stay.
Global capability centres remain a powerful draw. HRKatha reported that 69 per cent of respondents see a GCC as their first-choice destination for their next move. But the appeal is not simply the multinational name. Career growth ranks ahead of brand reputation when workers assess GCC roles, followed by local leadership, culture, AI exposure and compensation. At the same time, only 36 per cent of GCC employees say their career path is very clear, leaving many centres with a branding advantage but a clarity problem.
The underlying picture is of a workforce that is far from settled. A majority of respondents said they are already looking for their next role, while many of the rest would consider a similar offer. Older, more experienced professionals appear especially mobile. That does not mean they will all resign, but it does show how fragile loyalty has become when better growth, clearer development or stronger technical exposure is available elsewhere. For employers, the lesson is straightforward: the application process begins long before the application itself, and by the time the call comes, the verdict may already have been reached.
Disclaimer: This article is intended to inform and educate, not to recommend or endorse any financial product, investment or strategy. Please consider your own financial circumstances and seek professional advice where appropriate before making financial decisions.
